[49] Directly accessible data for 170 industries from 50 countries Accessed January 12, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/655057/fuel-consumption-of-airlines-worldwide/, IATA. Fuel burn is also very important because it is highly correlated with emissions and contributes directly to transport externalities. On the other side, the least efficient was British Airways at 27 pax-km/L (3.7 L/100 km [64 mpg‑US] per passenger), using fuel-inefficient Boeing 747-400s with a low density of 0.75 seat/m2 due to a high 25% premium seating, in spite of a high 82% load factor. Since they live in Montana, I will soon be doing some long-distance traveling. (Wingspan is limited by the available width in the ICAO Aerodrome Reference Code.) Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Applied Materials Research (IFAM) have researched a sharkskin-imitating paint that would reduce drag through a riblet effect. Jet fuel price developments - impact of Euro/US$ exchange rate movements. Overview and forecasts on trending topics, Key figures and rankings about brands and companies, Consumer insights and preferences in various industries, Detailed information about political and social topics, All key figures about regions and countries, Everything you need to know about Consumer Goods, Identify market potentials of the digital future, Technology Market Outlook Airbus installed wingtip fences on its planes since the A310-300 in 1985, and Sharklet blended-winglets for the A320 were launched during the November 2009 Dubai air show. Although airlines have more sophisticated tools to plan refuelling, this is how GA pilots estimate how much fuel there should be in the tank. ", "U.S. domestic airline fuel-efficiency ranking 2017-2018", "Calculating the carbon footprint from different classes of air travel", "SAS flies slower to save costs and emissions", "Transpacific airline fuel efficiency ranking, 2016", "Aeroflot, the route to a modern airline. 28, No. [14] This is less than jets used by major airlines today, however propeller planes are much more efficient. [16] Only take the fuel you need. [109], CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (, Learn how and when to remove this template message, Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise, "The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018", "CO2 emissions from commercial aviation, 2018", International Council on Clean Transportation, "Dubai 09: A320s sharklets to deliver 3.5% lower fuel burn from 2012", Why the Longest Nonstop Flights Are Ending, "SIA to drop nonstop USA flights as Airbus buys back A340s", "Last Call for the Long Haul From Singapore to Newark", "A new era of 'ultra-long-haul' aviation", "Effect of Fuel Properties on the Specific Thrust of a Ramjet Engine", "Back to the Future: Return of the Turboprop? This alteration dramatically reduces the drag and improves fuel efficiency. [34] Maintenance can also save fuel: 100 kg (220 lb) more fuel is consumed without an engine wash schedule; 50 kg (110 lb) with a 5 mm (0.20 in) slat rigging gap, 40 kg (88 lb) with a 10 mm (0.39 in) spoiler rigging gap, and 15 kg (33 lb) with a damaged door seal. actual consumption. The rate at which energy is imparted equals thrust multiplied by airspeed. [16], Jet airliners have become 70% more fuel efficient between 1967 and 2007. The efficiency can be defined as the amount of energy imparted to the plane per unit of energy in the fuel. [28], In 2018, CO₂ emissions totalled 918 Mt with passenger transport accounting for 81% or 744 Mt, for 8.2 trillion revenue passenger kilometres:[29] an average fuel economy of 90.7 g/RPK CO₂ - 29 g/km of fuel (3.61 L/100 km [65.2 mpg‑US] per passenger), In 2019, Wizz Air stated a 57 g/RPK CO₂ emissions (equivalent to 18.1 g/km of fuel, 2.27 L/100 km [104 mpg‑US] per passenger), 40% lower than IAG or Lufthansa (95 g CO₂/RPK - 30 g/km of fuel, 3.8 L/100 km [62 mpg‑US] per passenger), due to their business classes, lower-density seating, and flight connections. The US commercial fleet burns roughly 2 million gallons of fuel per hour, or 7.6 million liters per hour. The tourism industry could shift emphasis to emissions eco-efficiency in CO2 per unit of revenue or profit instead of fuel economy, favoring shorter trips and ground transportation over flying long journeys to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ", IATA, Total fuel consumption of commercial airlines worldwide between 2005 and 2021 (in billion gallons) Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/655057/fuel-consumption-of-airlines-worldwide/ (last visited January 12, 2021), Total fuel consumption of commercial airlines worldwide between 2005 and 2021, Air traffic - worldwide revenue with passengers 2005-2021, Passenger yield of airlines worldwide 2005-2021, Commercial airlines worldwide - fuel consumption 2005-2021, Share of fuel costs in the aviation industry 2011-2020, Worldwide air passenger traffic share by region 2019, Countries with the highest number of airline passengers globally 2018, Global air carrier market - share of ASMs by region 2018, Available seat kilometers of airlines worldwide - growth by region 2011-2021, Monthly international revenue-passenger kilometers (RPK) change by region 2020, Commercial airlines worldwide - passenger load factor 2005-2021, Monthly passenger load factor (PLF) on international flights by region 2020, Largest airlines worldwide - ranked by sales 2020, Leading airlines worldwide - based on total number of passengers 2019, The leading airlines ranked by brand value 2020, Operating margin of the major airline groups worldwide 2018, Passenger kilometers flown by airline worldwide 2019, Leading airlines with the biggest fleet size 2019, Global air traffic - number of flights 2004-2021, Most punctual low cost carriers worldwide 2019, Punctuality rate of airlines in North America 2019, Air traffic - passenger volume forecast by region 2037, Air traffic - passenger growth rates forecast 2020-2039, Number of air passengers' growth forecast worldwide by region 2018-2050, Air passengers forecast worldwide by generation 2018-2050, Forecast of worldwide airline fuel expenses 2005-2021, Canadian airlines - fuel consumption 1990-2019, U.S. airlines - fuel consumption 2004-2019, Hawaiian Holdings Inc.'s fuel consumption 2013-2019, Fuel efficiency of prominent transatlantic airlines by airline 2017, Worldwide airlines - non-fuel expenses 2005-2021, Weekly seat capacity: North American domestic airlines by carrier 2016, Major U.S. air carriers - percentage of cancellations 2000-2019, U.S. air carriers - total scheduled aircraft departures 1991-2019, Most important aspects when buying an airline ticket for personal travel U.S. 2019, Americans who travel by air by airline recognition 2017, Air carrier market share in South Asia - international traffic 2016, Latin American international air traffic market by business model 2016, Air carrier market share in Canada - international traffic 2015, Major U.S. air carriers - late arrivals 1990-2019, Consumption of recovered and other mixed fuels in Finland 2007-2017, Aviation spirit stock in the United Kingdom (UK) 2011-2018, Average aviation jet fuel price for operators by region 2015, Production volume of aviation fuel in Indonesia 2007-2018, Fuel and oil expenses of Virgin Australia Group FY 2017-2019, Low Cost Carrier (LCCs) Market in the United States, Total fuel consumption of commercial airlines worldwide between 2005 and 2021 (in billion gallons), Find your information in our database containing over 20,000 reports, Tools and Tutorials explained in our Media Centre, commercial airlines generated some 838 billion U.S. dollars, Passenger demand has been higher every year since 2009, air freight traffic has seen increasing growth, This increase in air freight traffic is likely connected to the rapid growth of e-commerce. Performance for the Purpose of a Commercial Aircraft", "CS300 first flight Wednesday, direct challenge to 737-7 and A319neo", "Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials", "Modern, Quiet and Environmentally Efficient: Lufthansa Group Orders 59 Ultra-Modern Wide-Body Boeing 777-9X and Airbus A350-900 Aircraft", "WOW air Sources A321s for Transatlantic Launch", "Beechcraft 1900D: Fuel, Emissions & Cost Savings Operational Analysis", "Proud to fly a Turboprop: Q400 vs ATR72", "Owner's & Operator's Guide: ERJ-135/-140/-145", "Embraer continues and refines its strategy at the low-end of 100-149 seat sector", "ANALYSIS: A320neo vs. 737 MAX: Airbus is Leading (Slightly) – Part II", "A Prius With Wings vs. a Guzzler in the Clouds", "CS100 environmental product declaration", "CS300 environmental product declaration", "Owner's & Operator's Guide: E-Jets family", "Sukhoi SSJ100, Embraer ERJ190, Airbus A319 Operational and Economic Comparison", "Analysing the options for 757 replacement", "Boeing 737 MAX: performance with reported engine SFC shortfall", "Carbon Offset Calculators for Air Travel", "Redefining the 757 replacement: Requirement for the 225/5000 Sector", "UPDATED ANALYSIS: Delta Order for A350; A330neo Hinged on Pricing, Availability", "737 MAX 8 could be enabler for some LCC Long Haul", "Aeroflot outlines performance expectations for MC-21s", "ANALYSIS: The Boeing 787-8 and Airbus A330-800neo are Far From Dead", "Airbus A350: is the Xtra making the difference ? NASA indicates this configuration could gain up to 45% with advanced aerodynamics, structures and geared turbofans, but longer term suggests savings of up to 50% by 2025 and 60% by 2030 with new ultra-efficient configurations and propulsion architectures: hybrid wing body, truss-braced wing, lifting body designs, embedded engines, and boundary-layer ingestion. The amount of fuel needed for a given flight can be calculated by multiplying the estimated flight time by the rate of consumption. I have started to think about flying there because the drive to their home is 16 hours of extreme boredom. HOURLY FLIGHT RATES, FUEL CONSUMPTION, AND WEIGHT REDUCTION CHART EFFECTIVE JULY 16, 2020 FOR CONTRACTS AWARDED 2018-2021 (CWN/Exclusive Use) (For Contracts Awarded 1/1/2018 and After) COMPANY. Total fuel consumption of commercial airlines worldwide between 2005 and 2021 (in billion gallons) [Graph]. This included the services provided by Singapore Airlines from Singapore to both Newark and Los Angeles that was ended in late 2013. From this site: fuel burn in cruise for B737-800 is 2,500 kg/hr; From this site: fuel burn at idle of a CFM56 engine = 300 kg/hr, so for the half hour descent two engines burn through 300 kg. *This publication supersedes ATP 4-43 dated 21 July 2014, FM 10--671 dated 2 April 1998 and FM 10602- Disclaimer. [citation needed], Multiple concepts are projected to reduce fuel consumption:[106], The growth of air travel outpaces its fuel-economy improvements and corresponding CO2 emissions, compromising climate sustainability. Research on the Interval Estimation of Aircraft Fuel Consumption based on the Data Distribution Characteristics. [31] NASA has conducted an Advanced Turboprop Project (ATP), where they researched a variable-pitch propfan that produced less noise and achieved high speeds. Airbus states a fuel rate consumption of their A380 at less than 3 L/100 km per passenger (78 passenger-miles per US gallon). It can have units of pounds per hour per horsepower. This design provides greater fuel efficiency, since the whole craft produces lift, not just the wings. Since the Skylane has a fuel capacity of 88 US GAL (including 10% in reserve -- Don't forget to subtract the 10% before figuring your consumption. For instance, Airbus has patented aircraft designs with twin rear-mounted counter-rotating propfans. [79], For flights of 4,650–7,200 nmi (8,610–13,330 km). The most fuel-efficient airline was Norwegian Air Shuttle with 44 pax-km/L (2.27 L/100 km [104 mpg‑US] per passenger), thanks to its fuel-efficient Boeing 787-8, a high 85% passenger load factor and a high density of 1.36 seat/m2 due to a low 9% premium seating. Jet engine efficiency increases with velocity because the speed difference between the flight and the exhaust is lower. [citation needed], For supersonic flight, drag increases at Mach 1.0 but decreases again after the transition. Their installation adds 200 kilograms (440 lb) but offers a 3.5% fuel burn reduction on flights over 2,800 km (1,500 nmi). Key drivers for efficiency were the air freight share for 48%, seating density for 24%, aircraft fuel burn for 16% and passenger load factor for 12%. [19] [47][verification needed] Here, your total weight on takeoff would be: [97] While this shows the capabilities of the vehicles, the load factors (percentage of seats occupied) may differ between personal use (commonly just the driver in the car) and societal averages for long-distance auto use, and among those of particular airlines. For a comparison with ground transportation - much slower and with shorter range than air travel - a Volvo bus 9700 averages 0.41 L/100 km (570 mpg‑US) per seat for 63 seats. The process model of aircraft fuel consumption in descent based on improved K-means is shown in Fig. A life-cycle assessment based on the Boeing 787 shows a 20% emission savings compared to conventional aluminium airliners, 14-15% fleet-wide when encompassing a fleet penetration below 100%, while the air travel demand would increase due to lower operating costs. The use of these calculators, maps or any information shall be at the user’s sole risk.